About this Journal

 
Article Abstract

Online ISSN: 1099-176X    Print ISSN: 1091-4358
The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics
Volume 6, Issue 3, 2003. Pages: 113-121

Published Online: 30 Oct 2003

Copyright © 2003 ICMPE.


 

Benchmarking the Quality of Schizophrenia Pharmacotherapy: A Comparison of the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Private Sector

Douglas L. Leslie,1* and Robert A. Rosenheck2

1Ph.D., Departments of Psychiatry and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, VA Connecticut Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Northeast Program Evaluation Center, West Haven VAMC, West Haven, CT, USA
2MD, Departments of Psychiatry and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, VA Connecticut Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Northeast Program Evaluation Center, West Haven VAMC, West Haven, CT, USA

*Correspondence to: Douglas L. Leslie, Ph.D., Departments of Psychiatry and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, NEPEC 182, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516, USA
Tel.: +1-203-932 5711 x 4015
Fax: +1-203-937 3433
E-mail: douglas.leslie@yale.edu

Source of Funding: This work was partially supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs New England Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center; and through a contract with AstraZeneca Corporation.

Abstract
This study compared the quality of antipsychotic pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia in the Department of Veterans Affairs and in a sample of privately insured individuals.  Logistic regression models were used to investigate the effects of health care system and patient demographic and clinical characteristics on the likelihood that patients were dosed according to published treatment recommendations.  We found relatively low rates of adherence to treatment recommendations, which may reflect a lack of awareness of these recommendations among prescribing physicians, or a belief that the recommendations are inadequate.  Differences between the two systems were mixed, with the VA outperforming the private with respect to some measures and doing worse on others.  Patient characteristics that significantly affected some of the quality measures included age, and having a comorbid diagnosis of other psychosis, dementia/Alzheimer’s disease, major depression, bipolar disorder, adjustment reaction or dysthymia.

 

Background: Comparing quality of care between large health care systems is important for health systems management. This study used measures of the quality of pharmacotherapy for patients with schizophrenia and compared these measures across a sample of patients from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the private sector.
Methods: A random sample of all patients diagnosed with schizophrenia in the VA during fiscal year (FY) 2000 was identified using administrative data. In the private sector, a sample of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2000 was identified using MEDSTAT's MarketScan database. For both groups, use of antipsychotic medications was studied and measures of the quality of pharmacotherapy were constructed, including whether patients were prescribed any antipsychotic medication, one of the newer atypical antipsychotics, and whether dosing adhered to established treatment recommendations. These measures were compared across the two groups using logistic regression models, controlling for age, gender, and comorbid diagnoses.
Results: Most patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (82% in the VA and 73% in the private sector) received an antipsychotic medication, usually one of the newer atypical drugs. Patients in the VA were more likely to be dosed above treatment recommendations, and less likely to be dosed below treatment recommendations. Overall, differences in proportion schizophrenia patients dosed according to recommendations were not statistically different across the two systems (60% in the VA, 58% in the private sector).
Conclusions: Differences between the two systems were mixed, with the VA outperforming the private sector with respect to some measures and doing worse on others.
Implications for Health Care Provision: Although the VA and the private sector were comparable with respect to the quality measures used in this study, there is room for improvement in both systems. Treatment recommendations are based on the best available clinical evidence of effectiveness and safety. Quality of care might be improved with better adherence to these recommendations.
Implications for Health Policies: Relatively low rates of adherence to treatment recommendations may be due to lack of awareness of these recommendations among prescribing physicians, or a belief that the recommendations are inadequate. To the extent that low rates of adherence to treatment recommendations are caused by a lack of awareness among physicians, policies should be developed to disseminate this information and encourage the appropriate use of these medications.
Implications for Further Research: Further research is needed to understand physician prescribing decisions for these medications. To the extent that physicians feel treatment recommendations for these drugs are inadequate, further research is needed to refine the recommendations.


Received 21 January 2003; accepted 22 September 2003

Copyright © 2003 ICMPE